Why Men Are Leaving the Left

Democrats risk losing men by ignoring their struggles. Addressing male hardship is key to rebuilding trust and securing democracy’s future.

A Crisis Ignored, A Voting Bloc Lost

Photo by Noah Silliman on Unsplash

For years, the Democratic Party has built its platform on inclusivity, social justice, and economic opportunity. But in its effort to address historical inequities, it has overlooked a growing crisis among men and boys. Last fall’s election made that clear: young men swung significantly toward Donald Trump. It was a warning sign, one that Democrats can no longer afford to ignore.

The problem isn’t just political, it’s structural. Men are struggling, yet their challenges remain largely unspoken in progressive circles. Without meaningful engagement, the party risks losing an entire generation to right-wing extremism, not because conservatives offer real solutions but because they at least acknowledge that men are suffering.

Maryland Governor Wes Moore is one of the few Democratic leaders recognizing this problem. His recent push to mobilize state agencies to support men and boys is an overdue step in the right direction. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont have also proposed policies aimed at increasing male participation in education and the workforce. These efforts mark a shift, but they remain isolated, overshadowed by a broader reluctance on the left to take male hardship seriously.

The Crisis Among Men

The struggles of modern men are undeniable. In every state, more women earn college degrees than men. Boys are more likely to be disciplined in school and less likely to graduate on time. Men die by suicide at higher rates, face rising rates of drug and alcohol abuse, and have steadily dropped out of the labour market.

None of this is new. Researchers have warned for years that declining male prospects, both economically and socially, create fertile ground for radicalization. When young men feel abandoned, they gravitate toward figures who promise strength and purpose, even if those figures exploit them.

That’s why Trump’s rhetoric resonates. When he talks about fixing the economy and restoring American greatness, young men hear someone who acknowledges their struggles. It doesn’t mean they trust him. It means he’s the only one speaking to their reality.

The Left’s Political Blind Spot

Historically, the Democratic Party has championed inclusion. But in the last few decades, its messaging has taken a turn. Instead of broad-based economic empowerment, its focus has often narrowed to specific identity groups. While programs for women and minorities are crucial, the absence of a parallel conversation about men’s struggles has left many feeling alienated.

The fear of alienating women or other marginalized groups has made the party hesitant to address male issues directly. But inclusion doesn’t mean exclusion. Acknowledging the challenges men face doesn’t detract from anyone else’s struggles, it strengthens the progressive argument that society should uplift all who are struggling.

Republicans, by contrast, have been unafraid to appeal to men’s frustrations. Trump doesn’t need to offer policies that will help them; he just needs to be the only one talking about them. The left’s silence has given him that advantage.

Inclusive Institutions vs. Extractive Systems

The issue goes beyond rhetoric. The Democratic Party has failed to explain how its policies will help men because it has not fully recognized how American institutions have become increasingly extractive.

Inclusive institutions, ones that empower citizens by expanding access to education, economic mobility, and political participation, have long been a foundation of progress. Public schooling, for example, was designed to give all children a fair chance at success. But when those systems become inequitable, when wealth determines the quality of one’s education, they shift from being inclusive to extractive. The same can be said for higher education, where the promise of opportunity has been replaced by crushing student debt.

Political institutions have followed the same trajectory. The Citizens United ruling allowed corporations to pour unlimited money into campaigns, giving the wealthy unprecedented influence over policy. Insider trading among politicians has created a ruling class insulated from the struggles of ordinary people. These extractive systems harm everyone, but they hit working-class men especially hard, stripping them of economic security and social purpose.

What Must Change

Democrats have a chance to reverse course, but it requires a fundamental shift. First, they need to stop treating male hardship as a political third rail. Men’s issues, education, employment, and mental health should be as much a part of the party’s platform as any other social justice cause. The success of women’s empowerment programs provides a blueprint: initiatives that encourage men to enter teaching and nursing, programs that address how boys learn differently, and mentorship opportunities for young men could all make a difference.

Second, the party must reclaim its role as a champion of economic justice. Limiting the influence of money in politics, expanding access to affordable education, and ensuring that working-class men see real pathways to stable careers should be core Democratic priorities. When people feel that institutions work for them, they are less likely to fall for the false promises of strongman politicians.

Finally, the left must engage in a cultural reset. Democrats cannot afford to be the party of condescension, dismissing male grievances as unimportant or self-inflicted. Men are not enemies of progress. They are potential allies in the fight for a more just and inclusive society. But they need to be invited into that fight.

A Closing Appeal

Young men are speaking. They are telling us what they need: respect, opportunity, and a sense of belonging. If progressives don’t listen, they will keep losing ground. The consequences won’t just be political; they will shape the future of democracy itself.

We can still change course. But it starts with recognizing that the struggles of men and boys are not separate from the broader fight for justice. They are a part of it.

If you found this article insightful, consider subscribing, sharing it with a friend, or supporting my work. Every conversation we spark brings us closer to solutions. Let’s not wait until it’s too late.